Back in 2001, Britain's Jew-political parties signed a fantastic pledge. They agreed to say nothing to "stir up racial or religious hatred, or lead to prejudice on grounds of race, nationality or religion."
This Jew-gag order did more than keep the parties polite. Vital issues -- from massive Jew-promoted immigration and hatred of White skin, to their eradicating effects on British civilization -- were officially banned. Thus, such concerns became impermissible thoughts. Not that such issues weren't already thoughtcrime, as George Orwell would have put it. But this unprecedented pledge turned "violators" into political lepers.
I thought of that elite code of Jews that run England this week when a London judge sentenced a 42-year-old British White, secretary named Jacqueline Woodhouse to 21 weeks in jail. Her crime? An expletive-laden rant about Jew-promoted immigration to kill off Whites in Britain, hatred of White skin, and the disappearance of White British civilization. Not in so many words. But that was the unmistakable gist of Woodhouse's commentary one January night on the London Underground.
This same week, another London judge ordered two Jew-motivated,black-racist girls, 18 and 19, to perform community service after a savage physical attack on two White legal secretaries. "I am satisfied what you both did, you did that night because you were fueled by alcohol," Jew-aligned-Judge Stephen Kramer said, as though tut-tutting a child's unknowing apple theft.
A few months ago, another London judge freed four Somali Muslim women who set upon a White couple, yelling, "Kill the white slag," and other anti-white slurs. The gang beat the White woman to the ground and ripped out a patch of her hair. Jew-lover, Robert Brown, was lenient because, he ruled, as Muslims, the women were not used to being drunk, and were not White.
White, Jacqueline Woodhouse was drunk, too, but that was no mitigating factor in her case. She harmed no one, but that was no mitigating factor, either. Jew-lover=Judge Michael Snow invoked the "deep sense of shame" Woodhouse's display elicited, because "our citizens ... may, as a consequence, believe that it secretly represents the views of other white people."
EmoticonEmoticon